Home of Avid Collectors of Aggregated Ideals...Widecasting via Google+, LinkedIn, Facebook, Tweetcasting, Pinteresting, Meddling, and generally Stumbling Upon and sharing all that's there to learn because an informed voter is a better voter.

Showing posts with label police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label police. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Bob McCulloch: 0 For 5 In Ferguson

Our beloved writer/friend David Phillips picks up a pen to call out 
Bob McCulloch as the police protector he is, instead of 
the prosecutor he has never been.
With his permission, we republish his blog here.

by
David E. Phillips

It is remarkably easy to get an indictment from a grand jury. Former New York state Chief Judge Sol Wachtler once said you could get a grand jury to “indict a ham sandwich.” There is no defense present. It is an opportunity to run up the score. What typically happens, when a prosecutor is seeking an indictment, is they present the evidence to the grand jury in an effort to achieve just that. Otherwise, why are they there? Normally, potentially exculpatory evidence is not shared with the jurors. Once again, the prosecutor is normally trying to gain an indictment. How easy is it to gain an indictment, you might ask? In 2010, the federal government brought 162,000 cases to a grand jury. They were denied all of eleven times.

Which is why what happened in Ferguson last night was so remarkable and deeply weird.

The prosecutor Bob McCulloch, in charge of Darren Wilson’s grand jury hearing, did none of those things. Watching his press conference last night, I couldn’t figure out what his job was. He sounded more like a defense attorney, not a member of any prosecution. What’s kind of fascinating to me is the idea of a prosecutor presenting the evidence in a way that clearly made it look like he was, at best, ambivalent on reaching an indictment. It is a rare thing for the prosecution to release all the evidence to a grand jury. His delivering of all the evidence to that body has been described as a “document dump.” Now, on one hand, you could argue this is how it should always be done. Maybe it’s the most honest way to do it, right? On the other though, you could point out this is almost never how it is done. In fact, it is beyond rare to find instances of it. Last night, on the various networks, a plethora of legal experts were completely flummoxed and unable to cite a single case in their experience.

McCulloch has a long history of closeness with police in the county. His father was killed in the line of duty in 1964, by an African-American man. McCulloch was twelve years old. As well, his brother, an uncle, and a cousin served in the Saint Louis PD, and his mother worked there as a clerk. The community of Ferguson was so concerned with the prosecutor in this case that they circulated a petition, one that resulted in more than 26,000 signatures requesting his removal from the case, which was something Missouri Governor Jay Nixon could have done when McCulloch refused to recuse himself.

Nixon, who could make a deer in the headlights look positively spry, issued a statement on August 19 that said he would not ask McCulloch to recuse himself, and he would be leaving that decision up to the prosecutor himself. McCulloch took this soft statement of support with indignation, saying Nixon should “man up” and make a decision. He went further still, making his offensive personal, “It’s the typical Nixon doublespeak. He says nothing and he’s ducking.” Nixon offered no retort. This sort of back and forth between a prosecutor, and the top elected official in his state, is positively remarkable.

What’s even more remarkable though, is McCulloch’s inability to return an indictment. Here was a case of an unarmed teenager gunned down in the street by six bullets from an officer’s gun. While eyewitness accounts were–unremarkably–inconsistent, there was no argument that officer Wilson caused the death of Michael Brown under, at minimum, unusual circumstances. Many citizens have been indicted for far less.

Ferguson has a long history of distrust between its citizens, who are 2/3 African-American (66%), and its police force, which as of August of this year, only three of its fifty officers were (6%). A police force that does not reflect the community is a powder keg of unrest. The shooting of an unarmed black youth in the middle of the street, and leaving the body there for four and a half hours, did nothing less than blow the lid off.

Last night, cars were battered, businesses were looted and buildings were set on fire. Martin Luther King Jr. once said “A riot is the language of the unheard.” You can argue that it’s counter productive, but to paraphrase what Ralph Wiley once said, there is a reason why black tend to shout. In the dark of the Ferguson night, they were screaming in response to a prosecutor who does not reflect their community, and quite simply was derelict in his duty. He, and the state of Missouri’s feckless governor, caused this last night. This is a population that does not know what justice looks like. And after watching McCulloch’s defensive and derisive press conference last night, they still don’t.

It was pointed out last night on MSNBC that Bob McCulloch has now brought five cases to a grand jury targeting police officers. He has returned an indictment against none of them. That means Bob McCulloch has indicted as many police officers in his twenty-three year career as I have. Think on that as you watch the people of Ferguson take to the streets.

Friday, August 15, 2014

The Tactics of DeHumanization

If the Hose Fits... (Moore, 2011)
When does the national conversation change? What is the trim tab that adds a new word to the general lexicon, one that was only being whispered in the back rooms of the old south as a spitten curse. Equalitization. Is it a photo? A video? A speech?

In 1963, images printed in Life Magazine told the story. Systemic arrests and harassments by local officials in Birmingham, Alabama were nothing new, but self awareness is a hell of a thing. Large crowds of people were starting to march led by a young preacher named Martin Luther King. Not yet a doctor but already a Reverend, he had a vision of change and a way of getting others to believe in that change.

Walter Gadsden being attacked by dogs in Alabama, 1963
(Hudson, 2011)
Peaceful clean cut kids who gathered in Alabama that fateful summer, with intelligent messages and a need to have their voices heard, were protesting the Jim Crow state of affairs in the area. Birmingham's Commissioner of Public Safety, Eugene "Bull" Connors, wasn't having any of that. There were laws enforcing segregation.

On a hundred degree day, the simple relief of a swimming pool in a public park could not be enjoyed by people whose skin was considered too dark to be human. You want to swim to cool off now, $1.50 will take that 103 degree day in D.C. into a manageable zone at one of many public park pools, regardless of race. In that summer of 1963 in Alabama, they were experiencing 110 degrees in the shade. It's not dry heat, it's not humid heat, it's some other kind of heat that beats down on you. A person of a pale complexion would have their neck turn bright red in that heat rather quick.

Bull and his buddies thought some bullying was in order, so they took out the hoses. And the dogs. DOGS. On a hot 110 degree day.

What has been seen, can't be unseen
(Colorado edu, 1968)
In 1968, 5 years later, they came again. Bunch of really smart kids calling themselves "Yippies" took over a park, wanted to the change the world, or at the very least, that national conversation. They were getting together peacefully to listen to music and have a few free drugs and some free love back then. Oh yeah, and to protest outside the Democratic National Convention about the seemingly endless Vietnam War. The people in THAT park from THAT time who were sick of war and calling for peace got hit with much worse than just hoses and dogs. Much, much worse. Like Bunker Hill worse. (Go to your local DVD download portal and see Chicago 10 to have all your questions on that one answered if you want to know more.)

Tanks? Really? Mine resistant Tanks? Yes, In Ferguson this week
(International Times, 2014)
The last four days, newspapers, websites, social media, and cable news are awash with images of tear gas, stun grenades, and rubber bullets being lobbed at innocent citizens on the street in 'ol Mizzou. Local residents were getting together peacefully to listen, to march, to sing, chant and pray the pain away after what seems like the senseless death of yet another unarmed teenager. Oh yeah, an unarmed black teenager.

When local police officials are embarrassed by an officer stepping over the line, protocol seems to be to attack those who complain until they shut up. Fear them into submission. Tell them they can't assemble after dark. Peaceful protesters, an alderman, and members of the Fourth Estate being arrested and harassed just because local officials are embarrassed. That's all it takes, shame and a desire to cover up mistakes made by a police force that has made too many of these mistakes in the past.

Militarized Police Overkill in Ferguson
(ABC News, 2104)
Rachel Maddow of MSNBC put it best today when she reported, "This is a policing failure on a huge scale. This is terrible, terrible policing. What is the justification? Terribly conceived and terribly done. The decision to treat this like a military operation is a failure in its own level, but the lack of professionalism, the lack of restraint, deliberately going after the media time after time after time to stop coverage of what they are doing is hard to fathom in its incompetence."

Perhaps shame has its rightful place here. Shaming the local police for their response to an active community of people who feel it is not only their right, but their duty to protest the gross distortions leading to multiple deaths of young black men. Southern Poverty Law Center President Richard Cohen offered this insight, "Our entire criminal justice system has mushroomed, in large part because certain politicians have made it a strategy to stoke fear among white people - fear about young black men. Young men like Michael Brown - and their families - are paying the price."

Police advance through smoke, Wed. August 13 in Ferguson, MO.
(MSNBC, 2014)
This time, caring and mourning patriotic protesting civilians were set upon by militarized officers launching teargas canisters into a milling crowd of the thoughtful. A real pressure cooker for the bubbling up of fear and hatred is being built and it's being stoked by local officials and local law enforcement. This should be a revolution of thought and process, shedding light on the entrenched racism rampant in the St. Louis police department. It should be. Self awareness is a hell of a thing. Do these cops need sensitivity training, or racial boot camp?

What is clear is that there is an urgent need to have this Ferguson police force adequately represent the local population of the people they protect. Today, Ferguson is nearly 70 percent black, but the law there is still enforced by a police department that is more than 90 percent white, a fact that helps engender widespread distrust of officers. Ferguson Police Chief Thomas Jackson confirmed, "50 of the city's 53 police officers are white.

Lone Protester Surrounded By Tear Gas Explosions
(USA Today, 2014)

After all sorts of complaints and concerns poured into the United States Justice Department in the wake of the last four days in Ferguson, the local police have been replaced with the state highway patrol and a brave Captain named Ron Johnson is at large and in charge. What a difference a day makes. This captain and his tactics have turned the situation around 180 degrees today. Tonight there is very little police presence. Young people are directing traffic and neighborhoods are self-policing their areas. It is a peaceful though raucous night in Ferguson this evening.

Tensions Ease As Highway Patrol Captain Marches With Ferguson Protesters
(BuzzFeed, 2014)
Will that be our trim tab? Will the photos of those hit with rubber bullets and covered with welts open the eyes of the sleeping? Will the video of people being gassed in their own front yards settle the issue of the use of excessive force by police officers in this country? Ah, if only this warranted a 'mission accomplished' banner. But we are far from a solution when it comes to racial bias in this country.

One all encompassing and remarkably easy deterrent against any unlawful bad apple police brutality is instituting the practice of placing cameras directly on the front of police officers. In the wake of the ongoing and numerous fatalities coming out of police/citizenry encounters, many talking heads in search of an answer to the problem are calling out for just that. The San Diego Police Department has reported making a large purchase of "body-worn" video cameras this year. Recently, Dallas police got a glimpse of what Chief David Brown calls "the future of law enforcement" when an officer's uniform worn camera recorded a fatal police shooting for the first time. Of course, that was June. There has been no report as to the outcome of the review of that footage. Hmmm.

Today, Joe Scarborough of Morning Joe used his bully pulpit to advocate that, "police officers ought to wear cameras. They really should. The only ones afraid of wearing cameras are bad cops and criminals. So let's make it a national thing."

Another "watershed" moment is right in front of us. This revolution, apparently, will be televised. Don't you just love history in the making? All power to the people and the policy they invent.

Lisa, The Policy Geek

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Standing For Protest

In Turkey they are doing something we find fascinating...standing protests. We love standing protests. So amazing. People are brilliant. 

Man emulating the performance artist who started this new form of protest. (Getty Images, 2013)

We've been watching all along, since the first hopeful huge gathering walked in the sun to waving flags from above. We've have been watching, photo-shopped or not, videos of the confrontations. Even in 2007 we could see images of violence in response to protests in Turkey. This time more people are paying attention, and again, a violence response from Turkey's leadership. It doesn't make sense. If people are peacefully protesting, what is the point of spraying them with pepper spray? Or sending out cops in riot gear?


This picture is going viral everywhere, image of a Turkish riot police officer attacking a woman with pepper spray.
What exactly did she do? Did this act make him feel safer? Was he trying to arrest her?
Was he trying to get her to stand down?
(Policy Mic, 2013)

This is a world wide problem. If you believe in austerity, why spend so much money attacking citizens? What's the marketing message there? These are perfect examples of no cohesive message by a governing body. Governments, democratic governments, are for the people and by the people. Right? So who decided that the people need to be pepper sprayed or beaten up or arrested. So confusing. It is a clear cut case of many departments, and no leader. Every time a mayor does something like this, he is saying he is lost. He brings the world's attention to that moment in time, instantly, and the world condemns it. 

Even if you are a tyrant, what is this brute use of force going to accomplish when these acts are done in the open light of day? We all see it all. Every corner of the world sees what is happening in a split second, if that. And people there tell everyone else. If you want to shut people up, you have to do so before they tweet, like by governing better in the first place.

It is no longer possible to stop a rebellion, before it starts, using overwhelming force. It's just not possible. Even if you kill all of your citizens, someone already posted the video, dude. Someone already posted the video.

And so we get to see images like this: 

A young musician won the hearts of the crowd by taking his piano on Taksim square and staging an improvised concert that lasted for hours. His performance of "Beatles" songs was met with thundering applause. People kept piling food and non-alcoholic beverages on the piano in sign of gratitude.
(Policy Mic, 2013)